Today's Times Of India quotes a scientist sudy that the increased frequency of having sex on a permanent basis is a kind of energy sapping distraction and that it comes in the form of marriage, kids and material possessions and stand in the way of living for long period.It is possible to raise the life expectancy beyond 80s and 90s by giving up sex (shall I say more moderation) and by eating less and exercising more.last week WHO proclaimed that we could soon be living in the world where living to 100 is normal.
yesterday's TOI also gave a sensational news and views on the caused by the intercourse when strong appetite and weak heart go together.the paper gave some example or rather a sample of a few individuals like Lord Palmerston,,,Nelson Rockfeller and Felix Faure meeting death after a night of passionate sex.To be on the safer side there i also a disclaimer that there could have been other health related factors besides the excess in this arena
While safe and healthy sex is not bad I would say that to realize full potentials of human beings,the intellectual hormones should not be hihacked by excessive indulgent in sex.Forget about living 150 years there is so much shortage of eligible girls for marriage in different communities because of the adverse sex ratio and many are deprived of leading a normal marital life
.One of the scientists casual statement that he has sex occasionally not on permanent basis and usually with the fellow scientist can not fit into a culture where family and children are valued more. Come to think of the 36 year old statement that post coital interactions can be quite boring is a negation of the art and science of love and marks the insensitivity to understand the feeling of the partner and that I am reminded of a sentence in a novel;Lolita read long ago....."My father took advantage of her on a rainy day and by the time the weather cleared he had forgotten her".Real life situation is not an episode in a story
One need not live 100 years the content of life is more important.i interpret the finding in the following way.Like a diet ,exercise sex also finds a place in life and what is needed is more moderation and more important there must be reciprocity and consent and that it is not just a physical act devoid of finer feelings towards the opposite sex.It is more divine and spiritual and not mechanical stress reliever as one would believe
yesterday's TOI also gave a sensational news and views on the caused by the intercourse when strong appetite and weak heart go together.the paper gave some example or rather a sample of a few individuals like Lord Palmerston,,,Nelson Rockfeller and Felix Faure meeting death after a night of passionate sex.To be on the safer side there i also a disclaimer that there could have been other health related factors besides the excess in this arena
While safe and healthy sex is not bad I would say that to realize full potentials of human beings,the intellectual hormones should not be hihacked by excessive indulgent in sex.Forget about living 150 years there is so much shortage of eligible girls for marriage in different communities because of the adverse sex ratio and many are deprived of leading a normal marital life
.One of the scientists casual statement that he has sex occasionally not on permanent basis and usually with the fellow scientist can not fit into a culture where family and children are valued more. Come to think of the 36 year old statement that post coital interactions can be quite boring is a negation of the art and science of love and marks the insensitivity to understand the feeling of the partner and that I am reminded of a sentence in a novel;Lolita read long ago....."My father took advantage of her on a rainy day and by the time the weather cleared he had forgotten her".Real life situation is not an episode in a story
One need not live 100 years the content of life is more important.i interpret the finding in the following way.Like a diet ,exercise sex also finds a place in life and what is needed is more moderation and more important there must be reciprocity and consent and that it is not just a physical act devoid of finer feelings towards the opposite sex.It is more divine and spiritual and not mechanical stress reliever as one would believe
2 comments:
I am with you on this. After all who wants to live to 150. All your friends will be dead and life would be so different from what you were used to. Life and economics depend on cooperation of two parties.
I am with you on this. After all who wants to live to 150. All your friends will be dead and life would be so different from what you were used to. Life and economics depend on cooperation of two parties.
Post a Comment